Subject: Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML p style From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 19:19:15 GMT |
> Mmh, just use eq if you compare an atomic value to an other one, and > = if you test if an atomic value is equal to one of several values, > isn't it? It isn't just the cardinality rules that are different, the way comparing values of different types are handled differs as well, with = being more lenient than eq (and even more lenient in backward compatibilty mode). Generally speaking I find the = behaviour more natural, and easier to type (which is an important consideration:-) compare the stylesheet below which returns $ saxon8 -it main eq.xsl Error on line 6 of file:/c:/tmp/eq.xsl: XPTY0004: Cannot compare xs:decimal to xdt:untypedAtomic Failed to compile stylesheet. 1 error detected. change the eq to = and it returns $ saxon8 -it main eq.xsl <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>true Daviid <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> <xsl:variable name="x"> <x>2</x> </xsl:variable> <xsl:template name="main"> <xsl:value-of select="2.0 eq $x"/> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML , Florent Georges | Thread | Re: [xsl] Getting WordprocessingML , Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] Saxon auto-recognition of, Florent Georges | Date | Re: [xsl] value-of w/separator and , Abel Braaksma |
Month |