Subject: Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional Grouping from MSXML From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:32:57 +0100 (CET) |
Yves Forkl wrote: Hi > From this line I understand that the XPath 2.0 "=" > operator allows to test an atomic value (like the string > that the attribute value is coerced into) against a > sequence and returns true if the atomic value equals any > of the members of the sequence. Yes, while other things. > If this is true, where I can find more information about > this feature and its prerequisites? I have searched the > relevant W3C specifications up and down, but in vain. This is in the XPath 2.0 REC: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath20/#id-general-comparisons Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez une nouvelle fagon d'obtenir des riponses ` toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expiriences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Riponses http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] Problem with Positional G, Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 2 Feb 200, Andy Carr1 |
Month |