Subject: Re: New XSLT draft From: "Alistair MacDonald" <AlistairMacDonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 11:10:05 +0100 |
>>> James Clark <jjc@xxxxxxxxxx> 07/14 9:05 pm >>> > Alistair MacDonald wrote: > > Also, there is no mention of a for loop construct - despite suggestions > > that it could be implemented without breaking the side-effect free goal. > > I presume that this was discussed and eliminated (rather than ignored). > We took a decision not to introduce any new features in XSLT 1.0 after > the April draft. We violated this rule in the July draft in a few cases, > but only so as to fix what we felt were serious problems in the > language. Should the topic of looping constructs have been listed in the areas for consideration then ? Alistair XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: New XSLT draft, James Clark | Thread | Using node-sets in reverse document, Tony Graham |
RE: Retrieving Distinct text, Kay Michael | Date | Re: Retrieving Distinct text, Pete Johnston |
Month |