Subject: Re: [xsl] The identity transform and attributes From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:47:22 GMT |
> But, if we have @foo standing for attribute::foo and attribute(foo), why > can I not do self::@foo? self::@foo is short for self::attribute::foo and you can never have two axis specifiers in a step. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] The identity transform an, Abel Braaksma | Thread | Re: [xsl] The identity transform an, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] The identity transform an, Abel Braaksma | Date | Re: [xsl] The identity transform an, Abel Braaksma |
Month |