Subject: Re: [xsl] saxon:try() From: Colin Paul Adams <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:38:20 +0000 |
>>>>> "Florent" == Florent Georges <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: Florent> Dynamic errors are reported only if the instructions Florent> or expressions that cause them are actually evaluated. Florent> So the error could remain not evaluated, couldn't it? Florent> And if it is actually evaluated, the transformation Florent> should fail because the error occured outside of an Florent> ex:error-safe. Now, that is assuming that ex:error-state is an instruction. And indeed, you created it as such. So if ex:error-state is an instruction, then it should expect to see errors caused by evaluating variables within that instruction. But you seem to be arguing that the error trapping should be lexically associated. In which case it should be part of a declaration, not an instruction. -- Colin Adams Preston Lancashire
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges | Thread | [xsl] RE : Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges |
Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges | Date | Re: [xsl] saxon:try(), Florent Georges |
Month |