Subject: Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in browsers, was: Re [xsl] XHTML html validation From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:52:52 -0500 |
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:25:15 -0500, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps it is worthwhile to create a little list with pros and cons for people that are new to the subject so that anyone can decide for his/her own situation. I understand that you know pretty much of this type of transformation invocation, maybe you can help improving a Wiki article on this subject (not yet there).
Not complete, I'm sure, but...
Cons:
- no caching of the processor object
- when using XHR (XMLHttpRequest), the transform will not be invoked. You will have to parse the DOM to find the PI and apply the transform from JS.
Pros:
- simple - works in almost every browser (just not in XHR)
best, -Rob
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Robert Koberg | Date | Re: [xsl] Using xsl:output in brows, Andrew Welch |
Month |