Subject: [xsl] second implementation of XSLT 2.0? From: "DuCharme, Bob \(LNG-CHO\)" <bob.ducharme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:03:18 -0500 |
Before a W3C Candidate Recommendation advances to Proposed Recommendation status, "the Working Group should be able to demonstrate two interoperable implementations of each feature."[1] So far, we've got Saxon for 2.0, but what else? A week ago I posted a message on the Xalan-J user list to see if anyone knew anything about schedules or stages of XSLT 2.0 support in Xalan, and I got no reply. I've recently learned that XML Spy is advertising XSLT 2.0 support[2]; does anyone know if they wrote their own engine and how good it is? thanks, Bob DuCharme [1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr.html#RecsCR [2] http://www.altova.com/features_xsl.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Retaining Comments, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] second implementation of , Jirka Kosek |
Re: [xsl] grouping and merging prob, Sylvain Rouillard | Date | Re: [xsl] second implementation of , Jirka Kosek |
Month |