Subject: AW: AW: [xsl] java xslt (saxon) + php? From: "Prerovsky, Clemens" <Clemens.Prerovsky@xxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:28:01 +0200 |
Hi Bruche, I'm using a very simple caching mechanism - file there - no need to generate it anymore. Compilation of out templates with about 350 lines of code against xml files with about 800 lines takes 3-5 secs. Parsetime didn't increase with more lines of template code or XML - seems to be general time it takes to fire up saxon. If you want high performance think about PHP5's internal XSL parser which is really fast. Yes - there is a drawback - it only understands XSLT 1.0 Templates :( Best regards, Clemens Prerovsky -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Bruce D'Arcus [mailto:bdarcus@xxxxxxxxx] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2005 16:23 An: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Betreff: Re: AW: [xsl] java xslt (saxon) + php? On Jun 23, 2005, at 10:17 AM, Prerovsky, Clemens wrote: > I'm currently working on a PHP5 project which incorporates Saxon-B 8.0 > as it's XSLT 2.0 processor. shell_exec works fine for me - I just had > to redirect stderr to stdout to be able to catch the error messages > with PHP. You will also have to use an absolute path for your calls to > Saxon to avoid classpath (or "whatever"-path :) issues. Thanks. Yeah, he has it working. But if you do that, what about JVM startup, caching, etc.? We were just concerned about performance in other words. Bruce
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: AW: [xsl] java xslt (saxon) + p, Michael Kay | Thread | [xsl] Copying an entire NodeSet wit, michella |
Re: AW: [xsl] java xslt (saxon) + p, Bruce D'Arcus | Date | Re: [xsl] Linking to a 6 level tag , Aron Bock |
Month |