Subject: Re: [xsl] Pipe Question From: Karl Stubsjoen <kstubs@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:45:54 -0700 |
> Ummm, actually, I believe David Carlisle answered that question a > couple of days ago. select='/..'. Thanks Jonathan for pointing that out, and sorry that I missed that. Thanks David! On 6/10/05, Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Karl, > > > If no value/list supplied for the param use the select. The select does > > not initialize/filter the param in any way. Correct? > > Correct it does not filter, although it could be argued it initializes > in the case that a parameter is not passed in. It sounds like you get > the basic idea. > > > > However, nobody still has answered the question: > > > > How do you write the select for a parameter to default to empty, not > > the original source? > > Ummm, actually, I believe David Carlisle answered that question a > couple of days ago. select='/..'. > > It's also mentioned in the XSLT 1.0 spec under 11.2 Values of > Variables and Parameters: "One convenient way to specify the empty > node-set as the default value of a parameter is: > > <xsl:param name="x" select="/.."/>" > > I don't do much with XSLT 2.0 so I'm not sure how the empty-sequence works. > > Jonathan T. Gorman.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Pipe Question, Jon Gorman | Thread | Re: [xsl] Pipe Question, David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Processing Efficiently, Karl Stubsjoen | Date | [xsl] translets not producing corre, celina |
Month |