Subject: Re: [xsl] What is exciting in XSLT 2.0 (Was: Re: [xsl] parameters in XSLT 2.0) From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 06:03:41 +1000 |
> James> also can an XSLT 2.0 just have xsl:function definitions aka; > > James> <xsl:transform > James> xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" > James> xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" > James> xmlns:str="http://example.com/namespace" version="2.0" > James> exclude-result-prefixes="str"> > > James> <xsl:function name="str:reverse" as="xs:string"> <xsl:param > James> name="sentence" as="xs:string"/> <xsl:sequence select="if > James> (contains($sentence, ' ')) then > James> concat(str:reverse(substring-after($sentence, ' ')), ' ', > James> substring-before($sentence, ' ')) else $sentence"/> > James> </xsl:function> > > James> </xsl:transform> > > > James> so libraries can be built up? > > Yes. > > This is a stylesheet (module) that has only built-in templates, and > so, if invoked as the principal stylesheet, will not call the > function. > > But if included or imported into another stylesheet, then indeed the > function might be called from other templates. > -- > Colin Adams > Preston Lancashire I think James is asking here if the above stylesheet can be a part of a *compiled* library. A while ago I asked this question in relation to Saxon's (8.x) stylesheet compilation feature. The answer by Mike Kay was that only a main stylesheet module (and all the modules it imports/includes) can be invoked from a compiled stylesheet. This is obviously a negative answer. What is necessary is something like: <saxon:include-compiled-module href="libraryModuleURL"/> Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] What is exciting in XSLT , Colin Paul Adams | Thread | Re: [xsl] What is exciting in XSLT , James Fuller |
Re: [xsl] Processing Efficiently, JBryant | Date | Re: [xsl] What is exciting in XSLT , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |