Subject: Re: [xsl] (correction) [xsl] differences between x != 0 and not(x = 0) From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:33:49 +0100 |
But I think you can do a simpler test for your needs - how about this: <xsl:if test="count(row/x[. != 0]) > 0)"> you never need to test count() > 0 it is equivalent to <xsl:if test="row/x[. != 0]"> except that it is less efficient (unless your system optimiser rewrites it) as the first form asks the system to find all the rows and count how many there are whereas the second form can stop the search as soon as it finds a suitable node. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] (correction) [xsl] diffe, Bondarenko, Taras | Thread | RE: [xsl] (correction) [xsl] diffe, JBryant |
RE: [xsl] (correction) [xsl] diffe, Bondarenko, Taras | Date | RE: [xsl] (correction) [xsl] diffe, JBryant |
Month |