Subject: RE: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment)] From: "Daniel Joshua" <daniel.joshua@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 13:39:31 +0800 |
Sorry, this might be a bit off-topic. >No, xhtml elements must be in the xhtml namespace. I think "must" is too strong a word. As long as my HTML is well-formed, it is considered XHTML, right? Instead of using a namespace, can I use a DOCTYPE to specify that it is XHTML? <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> So I can modify my XSL to this: <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" indent="yes" doctype-public="-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" doctype-system="http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"/> Regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, 25 May, 2004 5:47 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] Grouping into a table (for vertical alignment) Ooops, forgot to add in: <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" indent="yes"/> Ok, now its XHTML. No, xhtml elements must be in the xhtml namespace. If your stylesheet was generating a top level element in (any) namespace then it would default to xml rather than html output so the above encoding would not affect anything other than the encoding used. Usually you want to put the xhtml namespace declaration on teh xsl:stylesheet element. David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Grouping into a table (fo, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into, Arockia |
RE: [xsl] Recursion Problem, Jarno.Elovirta | Date | Re: [xsl] XHTML [WAS: Grouping into, Arockia |
Month |