Subject: Re: [xsl] table-row height attribute From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:50:48 +0400 (AMT) |
> I have to agree with Ken--it appears that the XSL-FO spec delegates to > the CSS2 spec to define the semantics of height on rows. Yes, it is true. > > As Ken says, if you want to limit the height of the cell content, you > must put it in an fo:block-container with an explicit height= (or > block-progression-dimension= value). No, it is not so. block-container with block-progression-dimension is a workaround which may work in some cases, and will not in others (when the cell is neihboring another one with row-span!=1). The correct way to limit the height of a cell is to specify block-progression-dimension on the table-cell itself. The specification allows to do so by explicitely listing block-progression-dimension on fo:table-cell. There is an error in the specification in that both height and block-progression-dimension are listed for table-cell. This makes no sense since height is mapped to block-progression-dimension in XSL FO. I admit that proper support of block-progression-dimension on table-cell may not be available in FOP. But then it is a bug in FOP; XSL FO allows it and it is the right way to specify cells with fixed height. David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] table-row height attribut, Eliot Kimber | Thread | Re: [xsl] table-row height attribut, Mark Williams |
Re: [xsl] Is exclude-result-prefixe, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Embedding html within xml, John Reid |
Month |