Subject: Re: [xsl] special characters From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 17:24:33 +0100 |
This is wonderful. (I haven't been following XSLT 2.0 in detail, being under the impression that is was totally focused on data and we document types were going to be able to ignore it. Perhaps I'd better start reading.) XSLT 2 appears to be based on user concerns and problems. Apart from this character encoding feature (which is also useful in non xml outout, eg outputting TeX commands in text output) It also has a lot of help for grouping and of course user xslt defined portable extension functions. If only the same could be said for Xpath2.... David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] special characters, B. Tommie Usdin | Thread | Re: [xsl] special characters, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Dynamic XPath, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] pulling child elements up to , Rick Geimer |
Month |