Subject: RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative to Location of Style Sheet From: "Robert Koberg" <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 07:03:26 -0800 |
I just tried to google 'xpath 2 relax ng schema' and did not come up with anything meaningfull, so i would like to display my ignorance and ask - why use W3C Shema? I assume becuase RNG came out later. Is there any interoperability between the two different schema languages(?) in XPath 2? If I like RNG, will I be able to use that in/for/with(?) XPath2? I guess, I mean why use W3 Schema when Relax NG is so nice, simple, clean and well documented? I like the idea of using schemas in XSL/XPath, but not if it is W3C Schema. befuddled, -Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of G. Ken Holman > Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 6:14 AM > As has been said it would be very nice to have some of the additional > features and functionalities to make working with XML easier than some of > the gyrations necessary for concurred limitations of XPath 1.0 ... but not > at the expense of the encumbrances of W3C Schema. > > XPath 1.0 was based on XML and Namespaces ... XPath 2.0 is not: it is based > on W3C Schema. Why can we not have an XPath 2.0 based on XML and then some > W3C Schema thingy or W3C Query thingy that is based on the PSVI? > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , G. Ken Holman | Thread | RE: [xsl] Locating Things Relative , G. Ken Holman |
[xsl] Problems using java extension, Carlos Barroso | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: applying templates to, Ram UGroups |
Month |