Subject: Re: [xsl] gedML VS. the new gedcom xml 6.0 proposal From: Eric Vitiello <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:41:25 -0400 |
-- L Rutker [Tue, 09 Apr 2002 12:52:31 -0400]: >Michael Kay started developing gedML but seemingly has not updated it in years. >Anyone care to comment on how different they are? >One area that I don?t like is the use of html within the gedcom XML >file in the new proposal. >(For example <html:BR />) I think that formatting has no place in XML but >belongs in the XSL. I guess the third edition of Michael Kay's book might use the new >format (assuming he likes it). This is excellent! I had begun development on FamilyML, which is based on Michel Kay's gedML structural ideas (available at: http://www.vitiello.org/familyml.htm). Looks like I'll start transitioning everything to gedcom 6! Thanks for the link! --Eric --- Eric Vitiello Perceive Designs <www.perceive.net>; XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] gedML VS. the new gedcom , Michael Kay | Thread | RE: [xsl] tableheader sort on date , "Braumüller, Hans" |
RE: [xsl] gedML VS. the new gedcom , Michael Kay | Date | [xsl] Netscape XSL and ' charcter, Deshpande, Gururaj |
Month |