Subject: [xsl] Table formatting challenge From: Norman Walsh <ndw@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: 12 Jul 2001 08:13:30 -0400 |
Consider the following table: +--------+--------+--------+--------+ | | B | | D | + A +--------+ C +--------+ | | | | E | +--------+--------+--------+--------+ Represented by this markup: <informaltable> <tgroup cols="4"> <colspec colname="c4" colnum="4"/> <tbody> <row> <entry morerows="1">A</entry> <entry>B</entry> <entry morerows="1">C</entry> <entry>D</entry> </row> <row> <entry namest="c4">E</entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </informaltable> The correct HTML for this table is: <table border="1"> <tr> <td rowspan="2">A</td> <td>B</td> <td rowspan="2">C</td> <td>D</td> </tr> <tr> <td class="auto-generated"></td> <td>E</td> </tr> </table> Can anyone see a practical way to achieve this result without resorting to extension functions? The tricky bit is not simply noticing that the introduction of namest may require some auto-generated cells to be inserted, but calculating correctly, in the presence of overhang (from an arbitrarily large number of preceeding rows), how many cells to insert. (This problem is slightly less serious in the FO case because fo:table-cell elements have a column-number attribute; although there are still some potential cell-border problems, I think.) I'm hoping I've overlooked something clever and elegant. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@xxxxxxx | Our years, our debts, and our enemies are XML Standards Engineer | always more numerous than we imagine.--Charles Technology Dev. Group | Nodier Sun Microsystems, Inc. | XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Generating a Table of Con, ghostrider | Thread | Re: [xsl] Table formatting challeng, David Carlisle |
RE: [xsl] javascript and xsl, Chris Bayes | Date | [xsl] counting again, Michael Schäfer |
Month |