Subject: [xsl] [exsl] Draft 0.1 - call for comments From: Jeni Tennison <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 08:09:30 +0000 |
Hi, I've put together a draft document that summarises our recent discussions on user-defined extension functions written in XSLT at: http://www.jenitennison.com/xslt/exsl.html Comments on it should be sent here, to XSL-List with [exsl] at the start of the subject line. The main part of the document specifies the extension elements and functions (viz exsl:function, exsl:return and exsl:node-set()) that we've been talking about. Several outstanding issues are highlighted, but comments on other areas are welcome. It would be particularly helpful to hear from implementers. Appendix B gives loads of use cases of functions that could be implemented under this scheme, many of them borrowed from Saxon, which demonstrate the strengths (and weaknesses) of the scheme described in the document. If you have more use cases, then please let us know about them and, preferably, their solution. I'm not sure how long would be an adequate review period - one week? two? longer? Maybe it's best to wait and see how much discussion there is. Cheers, Jeni --- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Escaping an apostrophe fo, Frank T. O'Connor | Thread | [xsl] [exsl] Re: Draft 0.1 - call f, Kevin Jones |
Re: [xsl] Escaping an apostrophe fo, Robert Koberg | Date | Re: [xsl] using parameters in filte, Jeni Tennison |
Month |