|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Beware the count method with Muenchian grouping (was: Testing by counting or positional predicate) From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:18:28 -0000 |
Daniel Bowen wrote: > > > I did some time runs with MSXML 3.0 and Saxon 6.0.2 (with Sun JDK > > 1.3) on Windows NT 4.0 Workstation with Sp5. Thanks very much for collecting this data. It reveals that generate-id() in Saxon, when using the "tinytree" tree model and a large source document, is extremely (and quite unnecessarily) inefficient. This will be fixed! A couple of points about the measurements: - if you were using Instant Saxon, you were using Microsoft Java, not JDK 1.3 as stated. JDK 1.3 is generally 2-3 times faster. - you can get timings from Saxon by using -t on the command line. Saxon 6.1 shouldn't make any difference in this area. Mike Kay XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Beware the count method w, Francis Norton | Thread | Re: [xsl] Beware the count method w, Francis Norton |
| [xsl] XSLProcessorException with Xa, Palaniappan, Krishna | Date | RE: [xsl] How to copy all child ele, Morris, Chris |
| Month |