Subject: RE: Grand Unification Theory From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 15:40:58 -0400 |
Hi Duane I agree, Its a must. But i should say that they are already very similar. So just a little more work to have full compatibility. But yes, this is needed too. regards Didier PH Martin mailto:martind@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.netfolder.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jelks Cabaniss Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 1999 3:18 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Grand Unification Theory Duane Nickull wrote: > I am for unification of XSL and XPointer. While we're at it, let's do the same with CSS and FO. /Jelks XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Grand Unification Theory, Jelks Cabaniss | Thread | Re: Grand Unification Theory, Lars Marius Garshol |
Re: Grand Unification Theory, Jelks Cabaniss | Date | RE: apache,perl,xml,xsl, Didier PH Martin |
Month |