Subject: RE: Style vs. transformation From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 16:01:03 -0800 |
-----Original Message----- From: Smith, Brooke [mailto:Brooke.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 1998 4:18 PM Perhaps I'm a little confused about XSL after reading the Microsoft tutorial (http://www.microsoft.com/xml/xsl/). I thought that the actions were an output. Here's what Lesson #5 says essentially: The XSL: <rule> <target-element/> <DIV> <children/> </DIV> </rule> would turn: <document> <chapter> <title>XSL Overview</title> <topic>Overview of XSL and its extensibility</topic> </chapter> </document> into: <DIV> <DIV>XSL Overview</DIV> <DIV>Overview of XSL and its extensibility</DIV> </DIV> And thus the action consisted of action commands such as '<children/>', and things that were sent to the output stream such as '<DIV>' and '</DIV>' in this case. Maybe what Microsoft was talking about was directly connected to their XSL parser which they said only delivered HTML (currently). There are two types of elements possible within the "action" - flow objects like <DIV> which are output, and commands like <children/> and <select-elements/> which control processing by evaluating recursively to a sub-tree of flow objects. This is XSL according to the Proposal for XSL, not a Microsoft derivative. The question posed from looking at Omnimark is why use XML as the XSL script, where I see a problem with understanding what are actions and what is the output (Question - is <DIV> different to <children/>?)? I had a go at learning DSSSL but haven't given it enough of a go as it seems oh so complicated. XSL seems much simpler though obviously (for me) it causes confusion. I don't think you are alone in your confusion, I hope that this is an area that can be improved. Jonathan Marsh phone 425.703.4591 <mailto:jmarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> jmarsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Style vs. transformation, Jonathan Marsh | Thread | RE: Style vs. transformation, Smith, Brooke |
RE: Style vs. transformation, Jonathan Marsh | Date | RE: Style vs. transformation, Smith, Brooke |
Month |