> Most Pong games end because of a timer. Whoever has the higher score when
> the timer runs out wins. It's not the most modern of game concepts, but
> it's symptomatic for Pong.
Really??? Working on memory, I only have memories of Pong
going up to a set score...
> Now, Warlords doesn't feature a timer, and you are moving closer in that
> direction.
I may or not be. I'm leaning towards keeping the main Pong concept,
maybe adding multiball ala Mondo Pong or Pterry in mid court to make
a few surprise hits...
> But I think if you focus on the physics of the flapping first, you can
> decide later how to work the gameplay around that.
AARGH OK OK OK I'M WORKING ON THE @#&$()@#&@#$ PHYSICS!!!!!!!!!
(Frickin' wusses! The games a good challenge. People expect to
win the first time they play or somethin')
(insert smilies as needed)
--
KirkIsrael@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://kisrael.com
"We were once so close to heaven, Peter came out and gave
us medals declaring us the nicest of the damned." --They Might Be Giants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
