Subject: Re: [xsl] module extensibility From: Max Toro <maxtoroq@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 15:41:10 -0300 |
I've yet to find another programming language where modules is the primary way of composition and reusability. Really surprised by this, and disappointed of modern languages like F#. Such a killer feature in XSLT. -- Max Toro On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Imports and redefinitions of macros are also available in > * Knuth's TeX > * the m4 macro processor > * the C preprocessor > * Lisp and its dialects > > The "module" concept is in a weak form, i.e., as a source file, not as > a named program structure with import and export. > -W > > On 11 April 2014 17:39, Max Toro <maxtoroq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Are there any other programming languages where I can import modules >> and override declarations besides XSLT? Using classes and inheritance >> does not count. >> -- >> Max Toro
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] module extensibility, Wolfgang Laun | Thread | Re: [xsl] module extensibility, Wolfgang Laun |
[xsl] Re: how to avoid hardcoding x, Larry Evans | Date | Re: [xsl] module extensibility, Wolfgang Laun |
Month |