Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0 question: What are function annotations? From: Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 11:06:58 +0000 |
> It's an error Mike. Surely to goodness you can fix that as editorial? > Liam, is it too late? > The WGs voted in their meeting in Prague to publish the PR documents as Recommendations subject to fixing of a handful of known errors. Editors have authority to fix things that are purely typographical, e.g. a broken link or a spelling mistake, but this is a technical correction so fixing it needs WG endorsement. Otherwise we would be in the position that a WG member could claim that the Recommendation as published is not what the WG voted to publish. Think what might happen if "errors" in an Act of Parliament were fixed after Parliament had voted on it... Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0 question: What , davep | Thread | Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0 question: What , davep |
Re: [xsl] Version 3.0 - which softw, [x] cross solution | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath 3.0 question: What , davep |
Month |