Subject: Re: [xsl] XPath shorthand From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:42:02 -0700 |
Assuming you are using XPath 2.0: following-sibling::*[matches(name(), '^[A-Z]$')] Cheers, Dimitre. On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Ihe Onwuka <ihe.onwuka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > what is shorthand for "folllowing-sibling::A | following-sibling::B > .........following-sibling::Z" > > Anything better than "following-sibling::*[self::A||self::B...|self::C] ? > -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev --------------------------------------- Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence. --------------------------------------- To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk ------------------------------------- Never fight an inanimate object ------------------------------------- To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the biggest mistake of all ------------------------------------ Quality means doing it right when no one is looking. ------------------------------------- You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what you're doing is work or play ------------------------------------- Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. ------------------------------------- I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XPath shorthand, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] Pattern Matching in XSl - fin, Kerry, Richard |
Re: [xsl] XPath shorthand, Andrew Welch | Date | RE: [xsl] Pattern Matching in XSl -, G. Ken Holman |
Month |