Subject: Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath 2.0 or XSLT 2.0 constructs faster? From: TW <zupftom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0100 |
2012/2/9 Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I like pure XPath solutions because they are less verbose, but I find >> "full" XSLT less restricting and easier to debug (especially when I >> want to check what variable holds what value). > > Since about 6 months oXygen has implemented stepping through an XPath > expression (not sure about setting breakpoints). Thus there should be > no difference in debugging XPath code and XSLT code with oXygen. > Interesting. How exactly does that work? Thomas W.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Dimitre Novatchev | Thread | Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Dimitre Novatchev |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 2 processors, Martin Honnen | Date | Re: [xsl] Rule of thumb: Are XPath , Dimitre Novatchev |
Month |