Subject: Re: [xsl] returning nodes which have a specific child From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:52:43 +0530 |
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Michael Sokolov<sokolov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > including the > bizarre conceit that attribute *nodes* are not matched by the 'node()' test > (perhaps some other name would have been more appropriate?). I am not aware of the discussions, that went amongst the WG members, when XSLT 1.0/XPath 1.0 was designed. But I think, Calling attributes as "nodes" is ok. As attributes are modeled similar to other kinds of nodes. They have name, value, parent etc. Attributes can be referred as @* while other kinds of nodes with node() and so on. I find this design ok :) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov | Thread | RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov |
RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov | Date | RE: [xsl] returning nodes which hav, Michael Sokolov |
Month |