Subject: Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical" questions about the language From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:09:01 +0530 |
Hi Ken, On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 5:04 PM, G. Ken Holman <gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <?xml version="1.0"> > <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="over-there.xsl"> > <?owner jsmith> > <root> > </root> > <!--copyright notice here--> > > The root node in the above document has 4 child nodes. It seems to me, that you are saying: <?xml version="1.0"> is a node in XDM. but this construct (the XML prolog) is not represented in any form in the XDM model (so it's discarded while building the XPath tree). Please correct me if I am wrong. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical", G. Ken Holman | Thread | Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical", David Carlisle |
Re: [xsl] Two "Philisophical" quest, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] [XSL] Two "Philisophical", David Carlisle |
Month |