Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 May 2008 05:10:01 -0000 Issue 1511 From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 12:30:11 +0100 |
> Equally adjacent text nodes are merged, so nested value-of's > are pointless: > > <xsl:value-of separator="xx"> > <xsl:value-of select="/root/node[1]"/> > <xsl:value-of select="/root/node[2]"/> </xsl:value-of> > > ...here the output is "foobar" as "foo" and "bar" are merged > before the outer value-of gets to them. No, that's not quite true. If you do this: <xsl:function name="f" as="xs:string"> <xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[1]"/> <xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[2]"/> </xsl:function> you will get a type error because the function is returning two text nodes, and you can't convert two text nodes to a string. Change it to this: <xsl:function name="f" as="xs:string"> <xsl:value-of> <xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[1]"/> <xsl:value-of select="$g/root/node[2]"/> </xsl:value-of> </xsl:function> and it works, because you can convert one text node to a string. Adjacent text nodes are merged only by an operation that merges them, for example <xsl:element> or <xsl:value-of>. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 Ma, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 Ma, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Combine two diff xmls - , Martin Honnen | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: xsl-list Digest 28 Ma, Andrew Welch |
Month |