Subject: Re: [xsl] Multiple elements condition From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 10:56:18 +0100 |
> I think there might be a rule here of "code the obvious" yes actually I need the construct quite often in the day job and what we seem to have mostly is foo[2] and not(foo[3]) which I think is reasonably clear and likely to be as efficient as anything. David ________________________________________________________________________ The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is: Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom. This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Multiple elements conditi, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Multiple elements conditi, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Multiple elements conditi, Andrew Welch | Date | [xsl] HTTP authentication support, Elliotte Harold |
Month |