Subject: Re: [xsl] client-side ajax & xslt From: "M. David Peterson" <m.david@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:17:09 -0700 |
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:04:52 -0700, Erik Wilde <dret@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i would prefer client-side, because it generates far less traffic and has much faster refresh times. Look at > http://extf.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/WebApp/public_web/ and read through this > http://www.biglist.com/lists/xsl-list/archives/200703/msg00158.html < thread from yesterday. Working sample is @ http://browserbasedxml.com/ -- /M:D M. David Peterson http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 | http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] client-side ajax & xslt, Erik Wilde | Thread | [xsl] A KISS from and for the W3C, M. David Peterson |
Re: [xsl] client-side ajax & xslt, Erik Wilde | Date | RE: [xsl] xsl:number from="/" level, Michael Kay |
Month |