Subject: Re: [xsl] Numbering 1st 2nd 3rd ... From: pnorton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:53:48 +0000 |
The mod solution isn't quite complete (but get's you on the right track.) Just watch out for 11, 12, 111, 112, etc. Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: Spencer Tickner [mailto:spencertickner@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 08:45 PM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] Numbering 1st 2nd 3rd ... > > Hi David, > > Thanks for the response. Unfortunately I'm stuck to xslt1 for this > job. I'll take your advice on the mod though. > > Cheers, > > Spencer > > On 9/12/06, David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > if you are using xslt2 just useordinal="yes" on xsl:numer. > > in xslt1 you'd have to use an xsl:choose after getting the last digir > > as (posiotion() mod 10) > > > > David
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Numbering 1st 2nd 3rd ..., Spencer Tickner | Thread | [xsl] Getting non-existing, but sup, Abel Braaksma |
Re: [xsl] Numbering 1st 2nd 3rd ..., Abel Braaksma | Date | RE: [xsl] Numbering 1st 2nd 3rd ..., Michael Kay |
Month |