Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence From: Florent Georges <darkman_spam@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:06:45 +0200 (CEST) |
tom tom wrote: Hi > But is the following true: an element node's consists of > the name of the element; a text node consists of the CDATA > assigned to that node; But an attribute node consists of > the name of an attribute *as well* as its CDATA - is this > not inconsistent? I don't think so. A node may have a name, and has a string value (and may have a typed value in XPath 2.0). But an element can have in addition sub-nodes, as its content may be more complex than a simple string. For an attribute, obviously, you don't need a tree with sub-nodes. You just need a single node, with two properties: its name and its value. It sounds rather logical to me, isn't it? Regards, --drkm ___________________________________________________________________________ Dicouvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Yahoo! Questions/Riponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expiriences. http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, Florent Georges | Thread | RE: [xsl] xsl:sequence, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] usage of entities (for du, Georg Hohmann | Date | Re: [xsl] xsl:sequence, Florent Georges |
Month |