Subject: Re: [xsl] plea for help... From: "Walter Torres" <walter@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 23:20:09 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, March 9, 2006 5:10 pm, Wendell Piez wrote: > Walter, > > > At 03:36 PM 3/9/2006, you wrote: > >> After a lot of thought and mulling about, I thought I'd share what I >> was thinking in regards to the "pure" XML I refered to earlier... >> >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> >> >> <article id="43467"> >> <status>in process</status> >> ... >> > > [etc.] > > >> or I was thinking about this for the </content> space... >> >> <content> >> <title>Intro paragraph here.</title> >> <sub-title>Main paragraph.</sub-title> >> <body> >> <![CDATA[all my xHTML goes in here]]> >> </body> >> </content> >> > > Hint: if that CDATA marked section is an indicator that you plan to > place "escaped" HTML -- don't do it. You'll regret it. I only brought it up because this is what we do now to send our content to a client. I have no idea why it's done this way, and I'm told I can't ask their IT anything on this either. :/ > If you want to use HTML, go ahead and use it. That's jus tit, I don't know if it should stay in HTML, or go "pure" XML (as my prevos post gave an example of my concept) > As for the modeling -- before you embark on this, I suggest you look > into some of the industry-standard DTDs and schemas out there. Thanks for the pointers. I'll be looking at those in the morning >> Or am I way over thinking this? > > Not necessarily. But it *is* off topic now.... OK, since this is "OT" where do I go so that this dicsussion in on-topic? Thanks Walter
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] plea for help..., Wendell Piez | Thread | Re: [xsl] plea for help..., Wendell Piez |
[xsl] RE: XSL-FO Question, borders , Jordan Soet | Date | Re: [xsl] print quotes in the outpu, sundeep |
Month |