Subject: Re: [xsl] trouble with preceding axis From: Jon Gorman <jonathan.gorman@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:55:00 -0600 |
On 1/4/06, Peter Flynn <pflynn@xxxxxx> wrote: > I think the key information the OP was missing is that this means > "a preceding element *called* orange" NOT "an element preceding > the one called orange". Nice summary. Probably should have been a little clearer in my post but this is the thrust of my post. > preceding-sibling::pear is what is needed. In this case, but I think what the OP was going for was actually to find the closest node (not clear if it needed to be a sibling or not) preceding orange. The others hit it on the head with preceding::*[1] (or preceding-sibling::*[1] which is more likely what is wanted). > Peel me a sibling. *lol* Jon Gorman
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] trouble with preceding ax, Peter Flynn | Thread | RE: [xsl] trouble with preceding ax, Xia Li |
Re: [xsl] trouble with preceding ax, Peter Flynn | Date | Re: [xsl] Paragraphs in Word XML, Peter Flynn |
Month |