Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt & doctype problem From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 14:42:35 +0100 |
> I find it counter-intuitive, but it is best to always put the most > generic templates above specific ones. Especially when not using > priorities on templates.. Beware that if changing the order of templates in the file makes any difference then you have a conflicting template match which is an error and a system may just refuse to generate any output at all. It may recover from the error by taking the last template specified, but it is always dangerous to depend on error recovery and it's better to avoid the error by not having multiple templates match a node with the same priority. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xslt & doctype problem, andrew welch | Thread | RE: [xsl] xslt & doctype problem, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Deciding whether param co, David Carlisle | Date | [xsl] RE : RE: [xsl] xsl:sort block, Stephane Dion |
Month |