Subject: [xsl] Re: Transforming XHTML to WML From: iwantto keepanon <iwanttokeepanon@xxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:08:46 +0400 (MSD) |
"andrew welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> WML is a small proprietary text to html language. I would advise to >> learn XSLT and use it to do your transformations. After all, XSLT is >> w3c recommended/standard and will be around longer and make your >> skills more marketable. Ok, proprietary was the wrong word ... and didnt I mention it being GPL? I forget and I dont have my original email. > Uh... it's not. WML is like HTML, it's just another markup language. http://thewml.org/ : "WML is a free and extensible Webdesigner's off-line HTML generation toolkit" So it is a text to html markup language ... still my original assertion. > It's very common to convert XML to WML using XSLT (I did it as part of > my dissertation 5 years ago :) Yes, and the OP didnt say this was a research project either. But I don't want to start a flame war on the merits of WML and whether it is a good language, every body's personal toolchest should have as many tools in it as possible. But I think this makes the very small point I was trying to make in my reply: http://googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=wml&word2=xslt Have fun ... -- Rodman
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: Transforming XHTML to, andrew welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Re: Transforming XHTML to, David Carlisle |
[xsl] Barcode Generation for styles, Meena Nanjundeswar | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: Transforming XHTML to, David Carlisle |
Month |