Subject: RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode characters? From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 11:43:20 +0100 |
> > > Shouldn't that be <xsl:output encoding="US-ASCII"... for safety? > > > > Neither is completely safe of course, > The spec only requires support for UTF-8 and UTF-16, anything else is optional. I personally use "iso-646" as the name of this encoding. The differences are immaterial (different names for some of the characters, I believe) but I prefer international standards as a matter of principle. Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Andrew Welch |
RE: [xsl] RSS feeds and disable-out, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Recognized Unicode charac, Colin Paul Adams |
Month |