|
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images From: "craig webber" <craigwebber@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:02:25 +0000 |
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:56:00 +0100
XHTML <img element can similarly only include one image at a time. In what way do you think that the FO version is any more restrictive than the XHTML one? From the XSLT stylesheet perspective you'd them in identical ways.
________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, David Carlisle |
| Re: [xsl] Measuring the complexity , JBryant | Date | Re: [xsl] XSL-FO & Images, David Carlisle |
| Month |