Subject: RE: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed template rule From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:37:52 -0000 |
If you're really determined you could do <xsl:variable name="dummy" as="element()"> <dummy/> </xsl:variable> ... <xsl:apply-templates select="(ABC/D, $dummy)[1]"/> <xsl:template match="dummy"> <something/> </xsl:template> Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl Stubsjoen [mailto:kstubs@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 21 March 2005 16:09 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed template rule > > That's what I figured. I was hoping to avoid such. It's much cleaner > to right a single apply-templates rule. Uggg. > > > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:54:06 GMT, David Carlisle > <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > How do I setup a template rule for this non-existent match? > > > > You can't: templates are fired by matching nodes, if you > select an empty > > node set, then no templates will be invoked. > > > > If you want something to happen if there is not an ABC/D child do > > > > <xsl:if test="not(ABC/D)"> > > something > > </xsl:if> > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________ > > This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The > > service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on > a proactive > > anti-virus service working around the clock, around the > globe, visit: > > http://www.star.net.uk > > > ______________________________________________________________ > __________
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed templa, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed templa, Karl Stubsjoen |
RE: [xsl] Catch ALL | Failed templa, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] Docbook index problem, Jirka Kosek |
Month |