Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:03:08 +0400 (AMT) |
> From owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Feb 3 19:01:54 2004 > Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl > From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@xxxxxx> > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Content-Type: text/plain > Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 14:24:59 +0000 > > On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 11:56, David Tolpin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just finished reading the working draft for XSLT 2.0. Forgive me > > the crudeness: what are advantages of XSLT 2.0 over Perl (http://www.perl.org/)? > > XSLT is human-readable? :-) It is only marginally more human readable than Perl and much less readable than either Python or Ruby. David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Peter Flynn | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Adam Turoff |
Re: [xsl] Problem turning a xml str, susana gonzalez | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Emmanuil Batsis (Man |
Month |