Subject: Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes RTF or exsl node-set sorting behavior From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 11:20:00 +0100 |
On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:31:54AM +0400, David Tolpin wrote: > > > > I think I did made my views known at the right time and in the > > right places, i.e. where that made sense. I think I also complained > > to Sharon and you at the time when Saxon used liberally RVT as > > node-set inputs. > > > > Would not it be logical then not to support exsl:node-set() in libxslt? > Instead of declaring it supported when in fact it is not due to > implementation problems? Well it woks well enough for a number of people... We actually tried to fix all the bug reported ! Agreed we had a lot of troubles due to the reason I exposed ... That's something I don't understand, you seems fine posting to this list "don't use libxslt" but I don't see your bug report on libxslt bugzilla ;-) You're clearly a good programmer, maybe you don't like my code, that's fine, still I find your reaction a bit surprising. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: libxslt version chang, Daniel Veillard | Thread | Re: [xsl] libxslt version changes R, David Tolpin |
[xsl] Re: libxslt version changes R, Dimitre Novatchev | Date | Re: [xsl] Re: libxslt version chang, Daniel Veillard |
Month |