Subject: Re: [xsl] No html if XSD present? From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 11:45:06 GMT |
> and took the namespace to be the place where structure and form are > defined.. Not really, it's just an abstract name for a set of element names, teh actual document obtained by dereferencing the namespace URI (If there is any such document) is arbitrary and unconnected to namespace processing. For example, xslt elements are associated with the namespace http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform But an xsl engine never tries to dereference that URI, and if you try it you just get a small place holder html document. Your schema will (or can) specify the namespace of the element names being used in the grammar defined in the schema. This is typically (but not always) different from the actual location of the schema. If you do make the namespace name and the schema location the same, then you want to place the schema in a relatively permanent, globally accessible place: you don't want to have documents refering to local copies of a schema effectively having the names of all the elements depending on the location of your local copy. David -- http://www.dcarlisle.demon.co.uk/matthew ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] No html if XSD present?, David Brown | Thread | [xsl] Simple XML transformation adv, Peter Dalmaris |
Re: [xsl] No html if XSD present?, David Brown | Date | Re: [xsl] finding elements lowest i, G. Ken Holman |
Month |