Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt critique From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:05:14 +0100 |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Didier PH Martin > Sent: 26 July 2002 17:02 > I didn't saw or read a lot of stuff about good XSLT programming > practices. This is missing in the XML landscape. Fair comment Didier. If anyone would like to send to the list what they see as best practice, I'd be happy to collate it on the faq. It will be interesting to see if there is agreement of a definition of best practice! regards DaveP. ********** snip here ************ - NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your system. RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Parameter evaluation afte, Oleg Tkachenko | Thread | Re: AW: [xsl] An easy problem, alex ek |
RE: [xsl] ANN: XSLT Tools and Resou, DPawson | Date | Re: AW: [xsl] An easy problem, alex ek |
Month |