Subject: Re: [xsl] more encoding woe From: Mike Brown <mike@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:51:45 -0600 (MDT) |
Andrew Welch wrote: > > Is this the case? If I specify > > { font-family:Arial, Arial Unicode MS } > > IE doesn't display the glyphs, suggesting that it isn't looking into > Arial Unicode MS for the missing font. Have a look at the "font linking" section of this document: http://www.unicode.org/iuc/iuc16/c6/paper.pdf It doesn't provide any examples, but if I read correctly, the "lang" attribute in the HTML, and the charset parameter on the Content-Type metadata, are hints that are used in this process, while CSS properties and rules take higher precedence. - Mike ____________________________________________________________________________ mike j. brown | xml/xslt: http://skew.org/xml/ denver/boulder, colorado, usa | resume: http://skew.org/~mike/resume/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] more encoding woe, Andrew Welch | Thread | [xsl] XSLT made simple, James Pasley |
Re: [xsl] Can apply-templates attri, Mike Brown | Date | [xsl] output of xsl:message in Coco, lrs |
Month |