Subject: Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:36:22 GMT |
> I'd rather write "... where d-o-e can't work". > Your formulation somehow suggests that the processor in Mozilla is > incomplete or defective, Sorry I didn't mean that. It's slightly bizare that d-o-e works in IE (which means that the transform is linearised and re-parsed which isn't the way clientside XSLT was supposed to work). Mind you it's hard to criticise IE too much for this at present since transforming linearising and re-parsing in IE is usually orders of magnitute faster than just transforming in mozilla, but hopefully that'll change, the mozilla/transformiix xslt implementation seems to be rapidly getting better at the moment. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Joerg Pietschmann | Thread | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, Wendell Piez |
Re: [xsl] Outputting literal and 'q, Petr Cimprich | Date | Re: [xsl] use cases for d-o-e, David Carlisle |
Month |