Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Postional predicates de-mystified From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:19:46 GMT |
> a[1]b[1]c[1] > > I think the intention is the latter? Ha: I get my own back: a[1]b[1]c David (I spared xsl-editors this one:-) _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Re: RE: Postional predica, Jeni Tennison | Thread | RE: [xsl] Re: RE: Postional predica, Michael Kay |
RE: [xsl] The hard cocktail of sequ, Michael Kay | Date | Re: [xsl] xpath2 functions returnin, David Carlisle |
Month |