Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt and edi question From: "cutlass" <cutlass@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 18:21:38 +0100 |
and thats because EDI represents ( at least to me ) the antithesis of what xml is as a pure file format, though i can use & in EDI without any *grumble*<![CDATA[]]> *grumble*................ cheers, jim fuller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clapham, Paul" <pclapham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:14 PM Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt and edi question > I can't speak for Allen, and I know this is off-topic for XSLT, but in my > experience with EDI the short answer is "Damn right they expect us to do > that translation." > > PC2 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Draucker [mailto:richard@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: August 1, 2001 10:03 > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt and edi question > > > I thought the whole value in XML for EDI was the deployment of a schema/dtd > to which each client would adhere. Are you saying the clients expect you to > > do the translation from their inhouse format to your XML schema/dtd for > them? > Just curious. > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] xslt and edi question, Clapham, Paul | Thread | Re: [xsl] xslt and edi question, Wendell Piez |
RE: [xsl] xslt and edi question, Paul Brown | Date | [xsl] fixed position, Meltem Kogelbauer |
Month |