Subject: RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL) From: "Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)" <lee.pollington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:37:42 +0100 |
I may be wrong but I thought it also introduced it's own elements into the XSL namespace - that's not very conformant is it? -----Original Message----- From: David Schach [mailto:davidsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 17 October 2000 00:59 To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL) Microsoft's latest xml product, msxml3, implements a compliant and high performance XSLT processor. Kevin Jones has compared the performance of most of the XSL processors. His results are available at http://www.tfi-technology.com/xml/xslbench.html David Schach -----Original Message----- From: Pollington, Lee (ELSLON) [mailto:lee.pollington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 5:40 AM To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript and XSL) I am currently putting some recommendations together for my company as to which parsers & XSLT engines we should use. Now I'd love not to recommend MSXML as from what I have seen it does not implement XSLT. However the need for speed is always thrown back. That's an argument in itself, I prefer early rendering and/or caching, but there can be times you need to parse & transform on the fly. I suppose XT might be a compromise, however I don't believe it is 100% compliant (please correct me). Really I'd like to use Saxon as it is well supported and has excellent compliance and error messages, but is a little slow. If anyone has any comments or suggestions as to criteria or arguments (details as opposed to "it's bad") I can use then please let me know. regards Lee -----Original Message----- From: Kay Michael [mailto:Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx] Sent: 16 October 2000 10:57 To: 'xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: RE: JavaScript and XSL > I am a newbie, so please excuse my ignorance. Yes, I have > read lots and lots. I hope you have read http://www.netcrucible.com/xslt/msxml-faq.htm Generally if you ask questions about the Microsoft dialect of XSL on this list, the response you get is "upgrade to XSLT". Mike Kay > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl"> > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, David Schach | Thread | RE: Which engine? (RE: JavaScript a, Ben Robb |
Re: !DOCTYPE element in xsl, Miloslav Nic | Date | RE: looping (was msxml install), Kay Michael |
Month |