Subject: Re: New document: Requirements for XSLT 1.1 From: Joe English <jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 11:06:49 -0700 |
<TRA@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think that the greatest part of this document is that "Language bindings > > MUST be provided for Java and ECMAScript". It's a shame that script didn't > > make it into 1.0. I hope that implementors don't think that they can only > > provide say Java and forget scripting. > > My 2p worth. > > My opinion is that this requirement is too strict, since it basically > will kill all non-Java based implementations. I thought that "12.3 Number Formatting" in [XSLT] and "3.5 Numbers" in [XPATH] already did a pretty good job of discouraging non-Java-based implementations. (3.5 isn't *too* onerous for C and C++ on platforms that support <ieefp.h>, but it's *really* tough to implement XPath numbers correctly in, say, Haskell.) --Joe English jenglish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: New document: Requirements for , Thorbjørn Ravn Ander | Thread | Re: New document: Requirements for , Dimitre Novatchev |
Embedding html in xml problem, Kerry Nice | Date | Re: running a for loop (eg.1 to 10), David Carlisle |
Month |